PDF and TeX
Includes an empirical evaluation and its experimental discussion. Use the exact file version when citing results.
The QGPL research files explain the licensing proposal, its cryptographic design and its limits. Their versions have different scopes.
The Quantum General Public License v3.0
The PDF and its TeX source discuss release signatures, metadata overhead and verification cases. They are the later research manuscript in this repository. The reported measurements should be read with the methods and limitations in that manuscript.
This site presents author research material for review. It does not claim peer review, journal acceptance or independent reproduction of the reported experiments.
Includes an empirical evaluation and its experimental discussion. Use the exact file version when citing results.
The Markdown document is dated 24 May 2026 and identifies itself as Draft 0.1. It introduces the construction and explicitly does not report empirical measurements. It is retained as an earlier document.
These research files describe QGPL 3.0. They do not implement or establish the separate 3.1 review draft.
A signature check concerns particular bytes and a particular key. A research claim also depends on the design of an experiment, the data used and the assumptions behind its interpretation. Keep those questions separate.
Inspect the source repositoryInclude the document title, author, year and file URL. When discussing measured results, cite the PDF manuscript rather than the earlier conceptual draft. Record the file version or digest in your own research notes.
Grigaliūnas, Š. (2026).
Binding Post-Quantum Cryptography to Copyleft:
The Quantum General Public License v3.0 and an Empirical Evaluation
of Mandatory Quantum-Safe Distribution Integrity.
Author manuscript.
https://qgpl.org/docs/paper/qgpl_quantum_safe_copyleft.pdf