An open idea with a long horizon3.1 in the making

Open results.
Shared futures.

Knowledge moves forward when we can share it. QGPL brings open reuse and post-quantum release integrity into one licensing framework.

For research data, AI outputs and the people who reuse them
Freedom needs a memory

A dataset may outlive its original website. A model result may travel far from its creator. The permission to reuse it and the evidence needed to check its integrity should travel too.

Why it matters

Big questions. Everyday files.

You do not need a quantum computer to care about the future of shared knowledge.

01

Research worth building on

Share a dataset with clear reuse terms and evidence that helps readers detect changes.

02

AI with clearer boundaries

Separate the model, its inputs and its outputs. State which rights you actually have.

03

Results that travel well

Keep permission, change history and release evidence close to the files people use.

The idea in three moves

Let the evidence travel.

QGPL stands for Quantum General Public License. It combines reuse conditions with a requirement to provide post-quantum release signatures.

01

Choose the rights

Identify the files you can license and the freedoms you want recipients to keep. Facts and third-party material need their own assessment.

02

Attach the evidence

Package the license, file digest, post-quantum signature and public key with the release.

03

Check before you trust

Verify the bytes, check the signing key through an independent channel and read the stated limits.

A tiny experiment

One small edit. A different fingerprint.

Change one value in our sample. The SHA-256 digest changes with the file. This demonstrates change detection. A digital signature adds a separate check against a signing key.

sample-results.csvLIVE IN YOUR BROWSER
Calculating
Calculating
QGPL 3.1 · Review draft

More context. Less guesswork.

The Open Evidence Edition explores a richer release record. Clearer rights, minimal disclosure and evidence that can be renewed as cryptography evolves.

01A rights map for each component
02Evidence with honest limits
03Minimal metadata by design
04A chain of renewal records
Project status

Know what is ready.

Open development means being clear about maturity and limits.

Published license

QGPL 3.0

The existing published text remains available. New terms never silently replace an existing grant.

Read the license
Under review

QGPL 3.1

A proposed next edition for discussion and legal review. No automatic upgrade from 3.0.

Review the ideas
Experimental tools

Toolkit 0.1.0

A working local CLI with ML-DSA-65 and an unsigned browser file lab. Their scopes are different.

Explore the toolkit
The research behind the idea

Binding post-quantum cryptography to copyleft

Dr. Šarūnas Grigaliūnas

Research manuscript · Sources and experimental code available

Built in the open

Read the thinking. Question the assumptions.

Explore the manuscript, standards and limits of linking open licensing with cryptographic release evidence.

Explore the research
Good questions

Start with clarity.

Does QGPL make every fact someone’s property?

No. A license can grant only rights the licensor controls. Facts and unprotected material remain subject to applicable law.

Does a signature prove that a result is true?

No. It checks signed bytes against a key. Scientific correctness, author identity and trusted time need separate evidence.

Is there a known date for quantum attacks?

No reliable arrival date is known. Preparing now is about migration time and the lifetime of information, not a countdown.

Is QGPL listed by SPDX or approved by OSI?

The project does not claim either status. Use a custom LicenseRef identifier and review suitability before adoption.

A small step forward

Give your next result a longer story.

Explore a sample, try the local tools or help shape the next edition.